Signature scanners check patterns. But the costliest gaps hide in logic no scanner ever sees. Venedy tests your API like a real attacker and confirms every finding only after a debate between multiple AI agents, before it ever reaches your report.
A customer changes an order number in the URL and sees someone else's order. The API answers 200 OK, and no scanner raises an alarm.
1 Salt Security, State of API Security 20262 OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023)3 IBM Cost of a Data Breach 2025
Venedy sends an AI against your API. It plans the attacks, chains them across multiple identities and decides for itself whether a response is truly a flaw. Clear-cut cases are settled instantly by fixed rules. When it gets ambiguous, four AI agents face off: whatever the attacker claims, the defender must refute. Only when the judge confirms exploitability does a finding emerge, every step readable in the log. Testing covers the complete OWASP API Top 10.
Formulates attack hypotheses and builds exploit sequences, here: access to other users' order data via manipulated IDs.
Looks for counter-evidence (auth checks, scopes, ownership) and tries to disprove the hypothesis.
Weighs both sides and decides on exploitability and severity, without false-positive noise.
Turns the verdict into a structured, traceable finding, with severity, OWASP mapping and a recommendation.
The AI reasons, plans, attacks and exploits. A deterministic engine makes every finding reproducible and provable: fixed thresholds, false-positive guards, a full audit log.
The most dangerous APIs aren't in any documentation. Before Venedy tests, it discovers your real API inventory (across code, infrastructure, docs and your asset register) and surfaces what nobody had on their radar.
Venedy searches four sources and assembles your complete API inventory, including the hidden ones.
Live in production, yet documented or registered nowhere, the classic way in.
Never showed up in a spec, ticket or review, increasingly built by AI code generators, say a debug or admin path.
Retired, old versions that were never shut down and keep running with an outdated security posture.
Still running, but the team responsible for them is gone, nobody maintains or patches them.
Correlated from four sources: code repositories · infrastructure & gateways · docs & wikis · asset register. Passive and read-only by default.
You see every test and every decision, keep your data in the EU, and aren't locked to anyone.
Data in the EU. No black box. No lock-in. EU sovereignty US suites won't give you.
Every test is traceable. You review the rules, not just the result.
An AI consultant explains findings and answers questions about risk and next steps, any time.
Your own test rules and playbooks. Your knowledge of your API feeds straight into the testing.
Every finding carries its own log: which agent decided what, and why, provable, today and in the audit.
All data is processed and stored exclusively in German data centers.
AI requests run statelessly against an EU provider, secrets are masked beforehand. Your API data does not feed model training.
European-hosted open-weight models instead of OpenAI. STACKIT instead of AWS. Consistently European, down to the infrastructure.
| Venedy | US alternatives | |
|---|---|---|
| Traceable findings | full audit log | black box |
| Data location | Germany / EU | US cloud |
| GDPR-compliant | native | costly |
| NIS2 / DORA | tagged per finding | not a focus |
| Entry price | from €625 / month | >€50,000 / year |
The gaps no pattern scanner sees are the ones you read about in the news. Have four agents find them first.
On one side, pentests and security engineering; on the other, years of hands-on work with API gateways in the enterprise. Both united in one platform.
As a pilot customer you shape the roadmap and workflows, early access, direct sparring, favorable terms. Or be among the first to hear about the public launch.
Please confirm your request via the link in the email we just sent you. Only then does it reach us.
Venedy
